Pueblos Mágicos

(Redirected from Pueblo Mágico)

The Programa Pueblos Mágicos (Spanish: [pweβloˈmaxiko] ; "Magical Towns Programme") is an initiative led by Mexico's Secretariat of Tourism, with support from other federal agencies, to promote a series of towns around the country that offer visitors "cultural richness, historical relevance, cuisine, art crafts, and great hospitality". It is intended to increase tourism to more localities, especially smaller towns in rural areas.

Programme logo

The program promotes visiting small, rural towns, where visitors may see indigenous crafts, landscapes and other attractions. The Government created the 'Pueblos Mágicos' program to recognize places across the country that have certain characteristics and traditions that make them unique, and historically significant, offering "magical" experiences to visitors. A "Magical Village" is a place with symbolism, legends, history, important events, festivals, traditions, great food, and enjoyable shopping, day-to-day life – in other words, "magic" in its social and cultural manifestations, with great opportunities for tourism.

The programme was launched in 2001. After 9 years and 32 towns having been selected, it was improved and relaunched in 2010. The government added resources to support local efforts and made it a priority under Secretary Guevara.[1] Every town was assigned a budget to continue improving its infrastructure, image, product offering, and experience, while making sure they were maintaining their traditions and their festivals were promoted.[2] By 2012, a total of 83 towns and villages in all 31 states have been awarded the title or nomination of Pueblo Mágico. The program created pride, recognition for its local citizens, and a diversification strategy to promote culture and Mexican traditions.

In late 2018, it was reported that the program would be canceled and would not continue for 2019 due to the lack of support of the president Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO). However, in February 2019, Humberto Hernández, Under-secretary of Development and Tourist Regulation in the Ministry of Tourism, said that the program would continue "more strongly than ever." Under the new decentralized strategy, while the tourism ministry will continue to handle qualification of prospective Pueblos Mágicos, its promotion, and branding of the program, state governors will handle the allocation of government funds to projects in the towns.[3]

A new class of 11 Pueblos Mágicos was inducted into the program on 1 December 2020, bringing the total to 132. This included the reinstatement of Mexcaltitán, one of the original Pueblos Mágicos, after it lost the designation in 2009.[4] As of August 1, 2023, there are 177 Pueblos Mágicos, located in each of the 31 Mexican states.[5]

Objectives edit

The objectives of this program are:[6][7][8][9]

  • To structure a supplementary and diversified touristic supply within the interior of the country for locations that contain important historical and cultural attributes.
  • To diversify the country's tourism offerings.
  • To create and promote craftsmanship and support traditional festivals.
  • To preserve local traditions, culture, ethnic customs and the unique cuisine.
  • To create tourist products like adventures, extreme sports, ecotourism, festivals, local itineraries, wine and food activities and sport fishing.
  • To reassess, consolidate and reinforce touristic attractions of these towns in the country which represent fresh and different alternatives to meet the rising demand of national and international visitors.
  • To create jobs and reduce poverty.
  • This program was also developed with the purpose of recognizing the labor of its residents who have kept their cultural and historical riches of their home towns.

Criteria edit

In order to qualify for the program, towns should have a population of at least 5000, and be located no more than 300 km, or the equivalent of traveling three hours by land, from a city with a well-resourced market or good connectivity.[10] The town's municipal and state authorities must request incorporation from the Secretariat of Tourism so that assessment visits can be arranged to evaluate the potential of the site.[6][10][11] In addition, towns had to meet specific requirements in order to be considered.

The criteria included some of the following:

I. A formally constituted "Pueblo Mágico committee", citizens who represent the pueblo or local community. If the town is accepted into the program, they are responsible for maintaining the designation by working with the local citizens. Their job is to represent the residents of the town and their interests to make sure that the declaration will benefit all and by working together to maximise the opportunities. This group has to be diverse, with no more than 15 people who are willing to contribute their work pro-bono. Group members should rotate periodically.

II. A town council accord, which states an agreement to apply for admittance into the program. The local authorities have to support inclusion in the program, as their support is essential for success. This document affirms the formal support.

III. Agreement of the state congress; state support is needed to assign resources, mainly for infrastructure.

IV. Direct economic contribution towards touristic development in projects, action plans and programs. Each town must try to differentiate from other towns. The plans should relate to the unique features of the town and why it should be considered.

V. An updated municipal touristic development program, with a time frame of at least three years. A long-term plan should be for 3 years to make sure the declaration is maintained, and that the town is working to improve conditions for tourists. The program should be updated every three years.

VI. Rules and local regulations should be updated to have a touristic focus during the current administration of the Municipality. This is to support and protect visitors and people dedicated to tourism activities.

VII. Evidence of the symbolic attraction of the aspiring community, or what makes the town unique.

VIII. Availability of health and public security services for tourists in case of an emergency.

IX. Documentation of private and social investment in touristic development and quality, including hotel rooms, restaurants, tours, museums, activities, etc.

X. Other elements that the committee considers relevant for touristic activity.

Process edit

  • The Pueblo's citizens committee and relevant stakeholders create the file containing all documents, details fulfilling all the requirements, and the request of candidacy to the Secretary of Tourism and the evaluation committee.
  • A formal presentation with examples and details is made to the evaluation committee during a scheduled appointment in Mexico City.
  • The formal committee has representation from Secretariats of Tourism, Culture, Environment and several other government officials.
  • The evaluation committee reviews the file, ensures that all the requirements were met, conducts a physical inspection in the town, and reports back by documenting findings.
  • If 100% of the requirements are met then they approve the nomination and turn matters over to the Secretary of Tourism who is responsible to visit the Pueblo, invite the local authorities and local residents, and give the new "nomination" or declaration at the same time that it has to take the oath to the local committee representing the citizens of the town.
  • The local citizens and the committee are responsible to maintain the declaration and the town's "magic" standing. Nominations are not permanent, with annual revisions and audits for some towns.
  • If an applying pueblo doesn't meet the requirements, the details are shared back to the committee, and the pueblo will be asked to provide any requested missing information.
  • If the Pueblo doesn't qualify due to inability to meet the required attributes, a formal response is provided to the committee.

Mexico has more than 2500 municipalities; hundreds apply annually to this program with very few of them being selected. This is a very successful and prestigious program that provides benefits to local residents who benefit from the resulting economic activity bringing prosperity and various tangible and intangible benefits to their communities.[12]

List edit

#ImageTownStateRegistration Year
1 Huasca de OcampoHidalgo2001
2 Real de CatorceSan Luis Potosí2001
3 TepoztlánMorelosDeclared in 2001, status revoked in 2009, but restored in 2010
4 Mexcaltitán de UribeNayaritDeclared in 2001, status revoked in 2009, but restored in 2020
5 TaxcoGuerrero2002
6 TepotzotlánMéxico2002
7 TapalpaJalisco2002
8 ComalaColima2002
9 PátzcuaroMichoacán2002
10 Dolores HidalgoGuanajuato2002
11 CuetzalanPuebla2002
12 IzamalYucatán2002
13 TequilaJalisco2003
14 San Cristóbal de las CasasChiapas2003
15 Real del MonteHidalgo2004
16 Parras de la FuenteCoahuila2004
17 Valle de BravoMéxico2005
18 MazamitlaJalisco2005
19 ÁlamosSonora2005
20 TlalpujahuaMichoacán2005
21 CosaláSinaloa2005
22 BernalQuerétaro2005
23 CoatepecVeracruz2006
24 Real de AsientosAguascalientes2006
25 CuitzeoMichoacán2006
26 SantiagoNuevo León2006
27 Todos SantosBaja California Sur2006
28 BacalarQuintana Roo2006
29 Jerez de García SalinasZacatecas2007
30 HuamantlaTlaxcala2007
31 CreelChihuahua2007
32 Capulálpam de MéndezOaxaca2007
33 Ciudad MierTamaulipas2007
34 El FuerteSinaloa2009
35 Santa Clara del Cobre Michoacán2010
36 TapijulapaTabasco2010
37 PalizadaCampeche2010
38 Jalpan de SerraQuerétaro2010
39 MalinalcoMéxico2010
40 ZacatlánPuebla2011
41 Teúl de González OrtegaZacatecas2011
42 TlayacapanMorelos2011
43 Mineral del ChicoHidalgo2011
44 Cadereyta de MontesQuerétaro2011
45 TulaTamaulipas2011
46 El Oro de HidalgoMéxico2011
47 XicoVeracruz2011
48 San Sebastián del OesteJalisco2011
49 XilitlaSan Luis Potosí2011
50 Mineral de PozosGuanajuato2012
51 SombrereteZacatecas2012
52 AngangueoMichoacán2012
53 Cuatrociénegas de CarranzaCoahuila2012
54 Magdalena de KinoSonora2012
55 PahuatlánPuebla2012
56 LoretoBaja California Sur2012
57 ValladolidYucatán2012
58 MetepecMéxico2012
59 Chiapa de CorzoChiapas2012
60 ComitánChiapas2012
61 HuichapanHidalgo2012
62 TequisquiapanQuerétaro2012
63BatopilasChihuahua2012
64 Chignahuapan Puebla2012
65 Cholula (San Pedro y San Andrés) Puebla2012
66 PinosZacatecas2012
67 Lagos de MorenoJalisco2012
68 TacámbaroMichoacán2012
69 CalvilloAguascalientes2012
70 NochistlánZacatecas2012
71 JiquilpanMichoacán2012
72 TlatlauquitepecPuebla2012
73 TzintzuntzanMichoacán2012
74 MapimíDurango2012
75 PapantlaVeracruz2012
76 TecateBaja California2012
77 ArteagaCoahuila2012
78 ViescaCoahuila2012
79 Jalpa de CánovasGuanajuato2012
80 SalvatierraGuanajuato2012
81 YuririaGuanajuato2012
82 XicotepecPuebla2012
83 JalaNayarit2012
84 El RosarioSinaloa2012
85 Aculco De EspinozaMéxico2015
86 AtlixcoPuebla2015
87CandelaCoahuila2015
88 Casas GrandesChihuahua2015
89 Coscomatepec de BravoVeracruz2015
90 GuerreroCoahuila2015
91 HuauchinangoPuebla2015
92 Huautla de JiménezOaxaca2015
93 Isla MujeresQuintana Roo2015
94 Ixtapan de la SalMéxico2015
95 LinaresNuevo León2015
96 MascotaJalisco2015
97 MazunteOaxaca2015
98 MocoritoSinaloa2015
99 OrizabaVeracruz2015
100 PalenqueChiapas2015
101 San JoaquínQuerétaro2015
102 San José de GraciaAguascalientes2015
103 San Pablo Villa de MitlaOaxaca2015
104 San Pedro y San Pablo TeposcolulaOaxaca2015
105 SayulitaNayarit2015
106 Talpa de AllendeJalisco2015
107 TecozautlaHidalgo2015
108 TeotihuacánMéxico2015
109 TlaxcoTlaxcala2015
110 TulumQuintana Roo2015
111 Villa del CarbónMéxico2015
112 Zozocolco de HidalgoVeracruz2015
113 Nombre de DiosDurango2018[13]
114 Melchor MúzquizCoahuila2018
115 ComonfortGuanajuato2018
116 ZimapánHidalgo2018
117 TlaquepaqueJalisco2018
118CompostelaNayarit2018
119 Amealco de BonfilQuerétaro2018
120 AquismónSan Luis Potosí2018
121BustamanteNuevo León2018
122 GuadalupeZacatecas2018
123 Isla AguadaCampeche2020
124 ZempoalaHidalgo2020
125 AjijicJalisco2020
126 TonaticoMéxico2020
127 ParachoMichoacán2020
128 Santa Catarina JuquilaOaxaca2020
129 Tetela de OcampoPuebla2020
130 Santa María del RíoSan Luis Potosí2020
131 ManíYucatán2020
132 SisalYucatán2020
133 Pabellón de HidalgoAguascalientes2023
134 Santa RosalíaBaja California Sur2023
135 CandelariaCampeche2023
136 CopainaláChiapas2023
137 Ocozocoautla de EspinosaChiapas2023
138 GuachochiChihuahua2023
139 Hidalgo del ParralChihuahua2023
140 General CepedaCoahuila2023
141 Ixcateopan de CuauhtémocGuerrero2023
142 ZihuatanejoGuerrero2023
143 AcaxochitlánHidalgo2023
144 MetztitlánHidalgo2023
145 CoculaJalisco2023
146 SayulaJalisco2023
147 TemacapulínJalisco2023
148 JilotepecMéxico2023
149 OtumbaMéxico2023
150 CotijaMichoacán2023
151 Tlaltizapán de ZapataMorelos2023
152 XochitepecMorelos2023
153 AhuacatlánNayarit2023
154 Amatlán de CañasNayarit2023
155 Ixtlán del RíoNayarit2023
156 Puerto BalletoNayarit2023
157 San BlasNayarit2023
158 General TeránNuevo León2023
159 General ZaragozaNuevo León2023
160 HuejotzingoPuebla2023
161 TeziutlánPuebla2023
162 Pinal de AmolesQuerétaro2023
163 CozumelQuintana Roo2023
164 Ciudad del MaízSan Luis Potosí2023
165Tierra NuevaSan Luis Potosí2023
166 San IgnacioSinaloa2023
167 San CarlosSonora2023
168 UresSonora2023
169 FronteraTabasco2023
170 TeapaTabasco2023
171 IxtencoTlaxcala2023
172 CórdobaVeracruz2023
173 Naolinco de VictoriaVeracruz2023
174 EspitaYucatán2023
175 MotulYucatán2023
176 TekaxYucatán2023
177 VillanuevaZacatecas2023

Towns removed from the program edit

Below is the list of sites that were enrolled in the program, but had their titles revoked for failure to meet standards during the re-evaluation or audit. One of them received enhanced recognition as a UNESCO World Heritage Site; the other two were subsequently brought into compliance and reinstated as Pueblos Mágicos.

#ImageTownStateRegistration YearRetirement Year
1 San Miguel de AllendeGuanajuato2002In 2008 its status on the list was removed due to its inclusion as an UNESCO World Heritage Site.
2 TepoztlánMorelos2001Status removed in 2009; reinstated in 2010.
3 MexcaltitlánNayarit2001Status removed in 2009; reinstated in 2020.

Other edit

Some governments have tried to eliminate the program for political reasons but because this model is a citizen-based program focusing on empowering communities, these efforts have been unsuccessful. According to statistics from INEGI, the Pueblo Mágico program has provided great economic value, and created jobs for its participating communities. The program has been recognised by several countries around the world, as a role model domestically and internationally.[14]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ "Destinan mil 900 mdp a 'Pueblos Mágicos'". www.zocalo.com.mx.
  2. ^ https://www.mexicodesconocido.com.mx/destinos-vivir-dia-muertos-mexico.html Day of the Dead in Pueblo Magico
  3. ^ https://www.sdpnoticias.com/economia/2019/02/12/gobierno-de-amlo-mantendra-el-programa-de-pueblos-magicos - SPNoticias,com, Gobierno de AMLO mantendrá el programa de Pueblos Mágicos (AMLO Government will maintain the Pueblo Mágico program), Feb. 12, 2019
  4. ^ Turismo, Secretaría de. "Anuncia la Secretaría de Turismo once nuevos Pueblos Mágicos". gob.mx (in Spanish). Retrieved 2020-12-26.
  5. ^ "Pueblos Magicos: A Guide to Mexico's Magic Towns". Journey Mexico. 2023-08-01. Retrieved 2023-08-21.
  6. ^ a b "Pueblos Mágicos, herencia que impulsan Turismo". gob.mx (in Spanish). Retrieved 2017-03-06.
  7. ^ Balslev Clausen, Helene; Gyimóthy, Szilvia (2016). "Seizing community participation in sustainable development: pueblos Mágicos of Mexico". Journal of Cleaner Production. 111: 318–326. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.084.
  8. ^ Pérez-Ramírez, Carlos Alberto; Antolín-Espinosa, Diana Itzel (2016). "Programa pueblos magicos y desarrollo local: Actores, dimensiones y perspectivas en El Oro, Mexico". Estudios Sociales. 25 (47): 217. doi:10.24836/es.v25i47.315. ISSN 0188-4557.
  9. ^ Uhnák, Adam (2014-06-01). "The Mexican 'Pueblos Mágicos'. A Qualitative Research Using Ethnological Methodology". Ethnologia Actualis. 14 (1): 8–18. doi:10.2478/eas-2014-0001. ISSN 1339-7877.
  10. ^ a b México, El Universal, Compañia Periodística Nacional. "El Universal - - Concierge Cómo identificar un pueblo mágico". archivo.eluniversal.com.mx (in Spanish). Retrieved 2017-03-06.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. ^ "DOF - Diario Oficial de la Federación". www.dof.gob.mx (in Spanish). Retrieved 2017-03-06.
  12. ^ "Las ventajas de ser Pueblo Mágico". www.elfinanciero.com.mx.
  13. ^ "México tiene 10 nuevos Pueblos Mágicos". Expansión. 12 October 2018.
  14. ^ "Example at internal level and to other countries" (PDF).

External links edit