Thailand articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
![]() | 3 | 5 | 8 | ||||
![]() | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
![]() | 2 | 21 | 32 | 3 | 58 | ||
B | 5 | 28 | 67 | 58 | 13 | 171 | |
C | 16 | 93 | 273 | 433 | 123 | 938 | |
Start | 10 | 159 | 1,205 | 2,688 | 696 | 4,758 | |
Stub | 1 | 42 | 837 | 4,973 | 2,475 | 8,328 | |
List | 1 | 7 | 64 | 327 | 4 | 50 | 453 |
Category | 2 | 1 | 6,405 | 6,408 | |||
Disambig | 1 | 3 | 119 | 123 | |||
File | 1 | 73 | 74 | ||||
Portal | 5 | 5 | |||||
Project | 14 | 14 | |||||
Redirect | 1 | 2 | 25 | 116 | 659 | 803 | |
Template | 614 | 614 | |||||
NA | 2 | 3 | 5 | ||||
Other | 114 | 114 | |||||
Assessed | 34 | 333 | 2,500 | 8,640 | 8,010 | 3,360 | 22,877 |
Unassessed | 1 | 10 | 1,097 | 1,108 | |||
Total | 34 | 334 | 2,500 | 8,650 | 8,010 | 4,457 | 23,985 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 78,139 | Ω = 5.48 |
Welcome to the assessment department of the Thailand WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Thailand, its land, people, and history. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Thailand}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Thailand articles by quality and Category:Thailand articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions
edit- How can I get my article rated?
- Please make specific requests at the main WikiProject talk page.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Thailand WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- Feel free to make another request or ask another project member for a second opinion.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions
editAn article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Thailand}} project banner on its talk page:
{{WikiProject Thailand|class=|importance=}}
The class and importance of an article should be assigned by listing them in the template parameters according to the quality and importance scales below.
Quality scale
editClass | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
| Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
![]() | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria:
| Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
![]() | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). | Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
![]() | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is:
| Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
| Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow. | Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
| Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Importance scale
editThe criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Thailand.
Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.
Importance | Criteria | Example |
---|---|---|
Top | Subject is a core topic that provides an overview of a main aspect of Thailand, or is crucially significant due to the subject's prominence in current events. | History of Thailand |
High | Subject is important to the reader's basic understanding of Thailand in general. Readers fairly familiar with Thailand or Thai students completing primary school would be expected to know something about the subject. | Chulalongkorn |
Mid | Subject is generally notable in Thailand, and a large number of people would have at least heard of the subject. | Burmese–Siamese War (1547–49) |
Low | Subject is notable only in a specific area of interest; most people learning about Thailand would not come across the topic unless they were already interested in the particular field. | Robot Building |
Assessment log
edit- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
June 23, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Central Lions F.C. (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- Category:21st century in Thailand by city (talk) removed.
- Category:Tambralinga (talk) removed.
June 22, 2024
editRenamed
edit- Kuman Thong renamed to Kuman thong.
- Kuman Thong (Black Magic Baby) renamed to Kuman Thong (film).
- Mu Krop renamed to Mu krop.
Reassessed
edit- 2022–23 Thai League 2 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Bru people (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Olaxson A Tamba (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Kuman Thong (film) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Kuman thong (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- Mu krop (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- Sandra Khopon (talk) removed.
June 21, 2024
editReassessed
edit- One Bangkok (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Signature Tower (Bangkok) (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Vacharaesorn Vivacharawongse (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Badminton at the 1970 Asian Games – Men's team (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Badminton at the 1970 Asian Games – Women's team (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Kuman Thong (Black Magic Baby) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Thai soap opera poster images (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Thai soap opera title card images (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
editJune 20, 2024
editRenamed
edit- Olaxon A Tamba renamed to Olaxson A Tamba.
Assessed
edit- Category:2025 events in Thailand by month (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:June 2025 events in Thailand (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:June 2025 sports events in Thailand (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- ONE Fight Night 24 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Olaxson A Tamba (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
June 19, 2024
editAssessed
edit- 2012 Songkhla United F.C. season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- 23.5 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Phrynichus orientalis (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- M.A.S.S. Builder (talk) removed.
- Draft:Warisara Seetaloed (talk) removed.
June 18, 2024
editRenamed
edit- Mu Krop renamed to Mu Krop.
- Pongsiri Por Ruamrudee renamed to Pongsiri Por.Ruamrudee.
- Yodwicha Por Boonsit renamed to Yodwicha Por.Boonsit.
Assessed
edit- 2011 Regional League Division 2 Bangkok & field Region (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- 2011 Udon Thani F.C. season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- 2012 Regional League Division 2 Bangkok & field Region (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- 2013 Regional League Division 2 Bangkok & field Region (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- 2014 Regional League Division 2 Bangkok & field Region (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Halfworlds (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Pongsiri Por.Ruamrudee (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Yodwicha Por.Boonsit (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- Draft:Léo Antonio Anthony (talk) removed.
June 17, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Huai Thalaeng United (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
- List of World Heritage Sites in Thailand (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- List of international goals scored by Teerasil Dangda (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- 2009 Regional League Division 2 Bangkok & field Region (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- 2010 Udon Thani F.C. season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Egypt–Thailand relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- Matt Hunt (journalist) (talk) removed.
- Nicolás Abot (talk) removed.
June 16, 2024
editRenamed
edit- Wat Paknam Japan renamed to Wat Paknam Japan.
Assessed
edit- 2022–23 BG Pathum United F.C. season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- 2022–23 Buriram United F.C. season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- Category:1920s in Chiang Mai (talk) removed.
- Category:1960s in Chiang Mai (talk) removed.
- Category:1970s in Chiang Mai (talk) removed.
- Category:1990s in Chiang Mai (talk) removed.
- Category:1996 in Chiang Mai (talk) removed.
- Category:1997 in Chiang Mai (talk) removed.
- Category:19th century in Chiang Mai (talk) removed.
- Category:2000s in Chiang Mai (talk) removed.
- Category:2009 in Chiang Mai (talk) removed.
- Category:2010s in Chiang Mai (talk) removed.
- Category:2013 in Chiang Mai (talk) removed.
- Category:2019 in Chiang Mai (talk) removed.
- Category:20th century in Chiang Mai (talk) removed.
- Category:21st century in Chiang Mai (talk) removed.
- Really Cool Airlines (talk) removed.