Wiki How:Featured picture candidates/Brahmeid Moth
Brahmeid Moth edit
- Reason
- Beautiful high-res photo
- Articles this image appears in
- Brahmaea, Brahmaea wallichii
- Creator
- Arthur Chapman
- Support Edit 1 --Kaldari (talk) 23:38, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - Beautiful, but unfortunately the lighting is harsh and the surroundings aren't ideal. ZooFari 00:54, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support. This is currently up for FP on Commons. As I nominated it there, I guess I should support it here. --Silversmith Hewwo 07:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Weak oppose For a single plane image, I would expect the DOF to be greater. No way f/4 can be used for macro without stacking.--Muhammad(talk) 17:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support edit 1 Sharpness concern is overruled by 10MP resolution. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- I don't agree. Providing more pixels does not mean the image can be sub-par. I downsampled the image and still half of the body is OOF --Muhammad(talk) 21:09, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- I downsampled to minimum eligible size, and everything is wonderfully crisp. I rather suspect though, that both of us are conducting original research, and therefore both comments have to be disregarded... Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 21:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- I don't agree. Providing more pixels does not mean the image can be sub-par. I downsampled the image and still half of the body is OOF --Muhammad(talk) 21:09, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Weak support edit 1. Don't love the harsh lighting, but it's generally a nice shot. J Milburn (talk) 16:11, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support edit1 Good sharp and proper wb --H92110 (talk) 07:46, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose original. Edit 1 is better, but I find lighting and background still disturbing. I would support Edit 1 as Valued picture. Elekhh (talk) 20:36, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support edit 1. Brand[t] 16:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Gave it time, but in the end, didn't have enough support.
Not promoted --Nezzadar [SPEAK] 01:35, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- IMO, Edit1 is a clear promote. --Muhammad(talk) 11:59, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Agree, Edit 1 should definitely be promoted. upstateNYer 17:37, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- I agree as well, 7 supports for edit 1, an oppose, a weak oppose and VP advertisment. Cowtowner (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Brahmaea wallichii insulata (Brahmeid Moth) wb edit.jpg --Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
🔥 Top keywords: Akademia e Shkencave e RPS te ShqiperiseAlexandria Ocasio-CortezBilderberg GroupCristiano RonaldoDong XiaowanMinecraftOperation GladioPrimal cutRiot FestStrictly Come Dancing (series 7)Main PageSpecial:SearchWikipedia:Featured picturesPawan Kalyan2024 Indian general electionKristaps PorziņģisMichael Mosley (broadcaster)Normandy landingsChirag PaswanOperation Praying MantisCleopatraPat SajakDeaths in 2024Jannik SinnerCarlos Alcaraz2024 ICC Men's T20 World CupHugh Grosvenor, 7th Duke of WestminsterSaurabh NetravalkarHighway of DeathNational Democratic AllianceThe Acolyte (TV series)Bad Boys: Ride or DieVanna WhiteHit Man (2023 film)United States national cricket teamThe Watchers (film)YouTubeUEFA Euro 2024Bill WaltonN. Chandrababu NaiduSabrina CarpenterAlexander Zverev.xxxLok SabhaBarry KeoghanHunter BidenChiranjeeviBaby ReindeerEminem