Wiki How:Articles for deletion/Frank Somerville

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. czar ⨹ 01:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Somerville edit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:Creative and WP:NOT and also the references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. 2602:306:CE9A:860:9580:22D6:79F5:B55E (talk) 04:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:23, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete He's a successful local TV journalist who has won several local Emmys. But I also need to see coverage about him in independent reliable sources, and I'm not seeing it. The only such reference I could find in a search, and the only one cited in the article, was a San Francisco Chronicle piece which was significantly about him. We need more than one such piece for notability. I used that item to expand the article, which curiously did not detail his broadcast career; as nominated it was mostly about his family, and the references were mostly about a picture of him that went viral on the internet. Despite my expansion I still think he fails GNG. --MelanieN (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹ 05:09, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In addition to the SF Chronicle piece metnioend by MelanieN, I found a decent San Jose Mercury News piece on him, and also a LA Times article on an incident involving racist Asian names. I think he meets the GNG. --Cerebellum (talk) 05:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I believe that the coverage in the San Francisco Chronicle and the San Jose Mercury News are adequate to establish notability. He is a multiple award-winning TV journalist of longtime high visibility in a major media market, the San Francisco Bay Area, and is now one of the leading news anchors in that market. Personal disclosure - I watch his broadcasts several times a week. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:29, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Recent profile in the San Jose Mercury News puts it clearly over the top in meeting notability.ShulMaven (talk) 20:55, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.