Wiki How:Articles for deletion/Adam Page and Kenny Omega

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Page and Kenny Omega edit

[Hide this box]New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable without inheriting from individuals involved. Tagged sporadically for a year, despite holding a championship.

Would be happy for a merge, but pretty much everything is already in the parent articles. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wrestling and United States of America. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: One source used, nothing much else found. Forbes contributor piece [1] then various non-RS websites. Delete for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 15:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This is not an argument so don't take this as whataboutism. I created this article with inspiration from other tag teams that existed for around a year, such as Team Hell No and Vince's Devils. I also followed the WP:PWTAG guideline where a tag team holding a championship for more than 100 days in a major promotion is considered notable. I think the nominator's argument is valid. However, I don't think it has lack of sources issue, although I agree most wrestling sites are dodgy, and that is why I relied on a book. BinaryBrainBug (talk) 13:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

- Delete per reasons provided by nom. Llajwa (talk) 13:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.