CrazyChemGuy

do u perhaps teach chemistry at a school? maybe at john handley? just wondering if i was right.

24.127.83.104 (talk) 02:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

No, I'm not a teacher.CCG _(T-C) 20:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure who has changed something on the Ladytron article but I'm trying to track the person down by contacting anyone in the history who has a talk page. Previously the Ladytron entry on Wikipedia has accurately credited Ladytron's first singer, Lisa Eriksson, on their first single "He Took Her To A Movie." But this credit has been deleted multiple times from both the 'Singles' section and the 'Background' section. The information is factual and verifiable. The 2004 repress of 604 released by Emperor Norton Records correctly attributes this vocal performance. Do you know how this information can be saved from editorial omission? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.225.245 (talk) 17:00, 9 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a bunch. I guess Cluebot is sleeping; otherwise it wouldn't have gotten most of the ones I zapped! ... discospinster _talk 22:57, 9 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 05:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello, CrazyChemGuy! Wikipedia:2008 main page redesign proposal was recently cleared of all design entries. You may want to re-enter your design(s), based on the details here. (You can see the old list of designs here).NOTE: A survey was conducted on what users wanted to see in the new main page, you can see the results here. NickPenguin_(contribs) 01:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:12, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll in selecting five proposals before an RFC in which it will be against the current main page. You're input would be appreciated. ChyranandChloe (talk) 04:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Parafon Forte a candidate for the Pharmacology Collaboration of the Month. Please click here to support or comment on the nomination. You are getting this message as a WikiProject Pharmacology Member

--Cssiitcic (talk) 20:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:36, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I am a new Wikipedia user. You have a nice layout on your page, so if my post bothers you, please delete it. I am asking you to take a look at the page for paroxetine. I feel the warnings about "controversy" should not be in the opening paragraph, as it is alarmist. I feel that scientific studies carry more weight than a BBC report which compares the "addictive" nature paroxetine to cocaine. Thanks, 161.150.2.55 (talk) 17:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)MwallaReply

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered at 03:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Volume 5, Issue 7

Weekly Delivery

2009-02-16

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 06:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

• Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
• An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
• News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
• Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
• Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
• Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

• Books extension enabled
• News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
• Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

• News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
• Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unsubscribe · Single-page · Full edition »

  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 03:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:41, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:41, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 08:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:06, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:39, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 15:50, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on File:3-aminoisobutyrate.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bananas21ca (talk) 21:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:3-aminoisobutyrate.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:30, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

I declined the speedy - just need to change {{PD-chem}} to {{PD-user|CrazyChemGuy}} and remove the no permission template  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:35, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit) Get free access to research! Research tools and services Resource Exchange Reference Desk Research Desk Discover open access Free Resource Guides Book Sources Journal Sources Bibliographies Free newspaper sources Online archives Find Your Local Library tips Find Your Source tips How to find sources Citation tools guide Outreach The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta) Universities and Libraries Archivists Publishers Wikipedia Loves Libraries Wikidata source metadata Get involved Get free access to sources Read the Books & Bytes newsletter Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar Teach Library Interns Become a Coordinator Learn about TWL ...Support Open Access...

Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.

Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!

If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 19:59, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Go fuck yourself! --24.177.0.156 (talk) 21:10, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!