Talk:Winds Code

Military history: Intelligence / Asian / Japanese / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

CYA?

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is it really necessary to add "CYA" to the end of the article. It makes it look so much less professional, too bad I can't think of anything better to say.

Agreed. Reads better. Apologies to the author, but taken the liberty of removing that comment. an attempt at CYA.^{[citation needed]} Ruairi lynch (talk) 17:01, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Blunder rather than Conspiracy

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Much of the content here is supported in The American Century. Harold Evans. Jonathan Cape 1998 pp312-313 - more in connection with the concept that the attacks on Pearl Harbor were the result of widespread Roosevelt administration & Defence blunders rather than a conspiracy. Ruairi lynch (talk) 16:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic