This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Scuba divingWikipedia:WikiProject Scuba divingTemplate:WikiProject Scuba divingSCUBA articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming articles
Underwater ice hockey is within the scope of the WikiProject Water sports, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Water sports. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Water sportsWikipedia:WikiProject Water sportsTemplate:WikiProject Water sportsWater sports articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required. * Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
so do they use SCUBA gear or are there holes in the ice to breath from? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.7.17.3 (talk) 19:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
According to the article, they do not, they breathe from holes. -- 70.24.250.103 (talk) 07:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago7 comments2 people in discussion
We can verify that two events have been held (2007 and 2013), but it seems like this is more of a stunt than a legitimate sport? Are there leagues, national organizations, anything? Is there any evidence that this "sport" has been played by anyone since 2013? 162 etc. (talk) 17:34, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
On second thought, went bold and merged the article. I'm just not convinced of the notability. Discussion welcome. 162 etc. (talk) 19:36, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
162 etc., You claim to have merged this article, so where did you merge it to? · · · Peter Southwood(talk): 03:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've reduced the article to a mention at Hockey#Other forms of hockey. The previous article [1], while much longer, was based mostly on primary sources authored by Christian Redl. Per my earlier comment, it appears that while some events have been held, I'd categorize them as an exhibition or stunt, rather than a sport. 162 etc. (talk) 17:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
162 etc., so not actually a merge at all. More of an untagged and undiscussed deletion and redirect of a fairly substantial article, reported as a merge and redirect. While I have no particular opinion or interest in the topic itself or its notability, and have not done WP:BEFORE, which I hope you have, I think this covert method of deletion goes against the generally accepted guidelines, even if that was not the intention. If you disagree, please explain why, otherwise I suggest you revert and if you feel it necessary, nominate for deletion, and let it go through the proper process. In my opinion it does not qualify for speedy deletion, and after this would also not qualify for WP:PROD, even if it did before, which I have not checked. Please ping with reply. · · · Peter Southwood(talk): 06:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, that is what happened. Per WP:BRD, feel free to revert. 162 etc. (talk) 18:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Reverted as inappropriate blank and redirect. No merge was involved. · · · Peter Southwood(talk): 01:09, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
