Talk:Lake Superior agate

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Maintenance Tag

edit
I tagged the article for cleanup because I felt that the article, while informative, did not read like an encyclopedia article. The content, while short, is good, but the focus wanders throughout its one paragraph. If anyone with knowledge of the subject can revise this article a bit, that would be excellent. Cherry Cotton 05:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Work appears to be copyrighted (tagged © 2006 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources). I'm not competent to judge whether the legal status of state published material puts in in the public domain. Tag added. Suggest either a rewrite or... Williamborg (Bill) 04:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Rewrote it to reduce the copyright violation potential. But it could stand other references and material. Anyone out there able to give us a hand here? Thanks - Williamborg (Bill) 02:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lake Superior agate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply