Talk:AFL Capricornia

Australia: Queensland / Australian rules football Low‑importance

	Australia portal AFL Capricornia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian rules football (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

who ever dose the photos fo this page can you please change it to the league logo. it seems abit unfair to have one teams jumper used when there are six teams in the league. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.7.59.235 (talk) 00:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Important

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

For all contributors. You need sources for the information provided. The corrections I have provided are derived from the Morning Bulletin. If you want cites I will try and find them. Footy Freak7 (talk) 07:15, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Firstly, what is the Morning Bulletin. Secondly, this article desperately needs references. Can you add them for your content please? HiLo48 (talk) 07:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Morning Bulletin is Rockhampton's daily newspaper. I can't cite the refs properly yet. That's why I didn't add them. But it's all from the paper. Footy Freak7 (talk) 11:41, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Okay I just added a simple ref for now in the heading of the premierships list. Hope that's allowed. Footy Freak7 (talk) 11:45, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I reckon it's more than allowed. It's great. Clearly you're putting a lot of work into some excellent good faith edits here. Some pedants from elsewhere will be keen to see formal referencing asap (I guess I'm one of them), and if you can't do it yourself, any hints you can give about your real sources may help others turn them into good references. HiLo48 (talk) 20:24, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic