Haifanggou Formation

(Redirected from Jiulongshan Formation)

The Haifanggou Formation (simplified Chinese: 海房沟组; traditional Chinese: 海房溝組; pinyin: Hǎifánggōu zǔ), also known as the Jiulongshan Formation (simplified Chinese: 九龙山组; traditional Chinese: 九龍山組; pinyin: Jiǔlóngshān zǔ), is a fossil-bearing rock deposit located near Daohugou (simplified Chinese: 道虎沟; traditional Chinese: 道虎溝) village of Ningcheng County, in Inner Mongolia, northeastern China.

Haifanggou Formation
Stratigraphic range: Callovian-Oxfordian
~165–160 Ma
TypeGeological formation
UnderliesTiaojishan Formation
OverliesBeipiao Formation
(Separated by an unconformity)
Lithology
PrimaryConglomerate
OtherSandstone, mudstone, shale, coal
Location
Coordinates41°48′N 120°48′E / 41.8°N 120.8°E / 41.8; 120.8
Approximate paleocoordinates44°30′N 126°00′E / 44.5°N 126.0°E / 44.5; 126.0
RegionInner Mongolia
Country China
Type section
Named forHaifanggou
Named byLiaoning Stratigraphic Group
Year defined1978
Haifanggou Formation is located in China
Haifanggou Formation
Haifanggou Formation (China)
Haifanggou Formation is located in Inner Mongolia
Haifanggou Formation
Haifanggou Formation (Inner Mongolia)

The formation consists of coarse conglomerates, sandstone, mudstone, and thin coal layers deposited in deltaic and lacustrine environments.

The formation dates to the Callovian of the Middle Jurassic to the Oxfordian of the Late Jurassic.[1]

The most prominent locality of the Haifanggou Formation are the Daohugou Beds, located near the village of Daohugou in southeastern Inner Mongolia.[2] Other localities include Wuhuaxigou, Chentaizi, Jiangzhangzi, Wubaiding, Guancaishan, Haifenggou, Fanzhangzi, and Zhuanshanzi.[3]

Dating

edit

Daohugou bed

edit

The age of the Daohugou bed has been debated, and a number of studies, using different methodologies, have reached conflicting conclusions. Various papers have placed the fossils here as being anywhere from the Middle Jurassic period (169 million years ago) to the Early Cretaceous period (122 ma).[4] One of the first studies on the age of the Daohugou beds, published in 2004 by He et al., found them to be Early Cretaceous, only a few million years older than the overlying Jehol beds of the Yixian Formation.[5] The 2004 study primarily used Argon–argon dating of a tuff within the Daohugou Beds to determine its age.

However, subsequent studies cast doubt on this relatively recent age. In a 2006 study, Gao & Ren criticized He et al. for not including enough specifics and detail in their paper, and also took issue with their radiometric dating of the Daohugou tuff. The tuff, Gao and Ren argued, contains crystals with a variety of diverse radiometric ages, some up to a billion years old, so using dates from only a few of these crystals could not determine the overall age of the deposits. Gao and Ren went on to defend a Middle Jurassic age for the beds based on biostratigraphy (the use of index fossils), and the bed's relationship to a layer that is known to mark the Middle Jurassic-Late Jurassic boundary.[6]

Another study, published in 2006 by Wang et al., argued that the 159-164 million years old Tiaojishan Formation underlies, rather than overlies, the Daohugou Beds. Unlike the earlier study by Gao and Ren, Wang et al. found an overall similarity between the fossil animals found in the Daohugou Beds and those from the Yixian Formation. The authors stated that

"vertebrate fossils such as Liaoxitriton, Jeholopterus and feathered maniraptorans show much resemblance to those of the Yixian Formation. In other words, despite the absence of Lycoptera, a typical fish of the Jehol Biota, the Daohugou vertebrate assemblage is closer to that of the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota than to any other biota."

Wang et al. concluded that the Daohugou probably represents the earliest evolutionary stages of the Jehol Biota, and that it "belongs to the same cycle of volcanism and sedimentation as the Yixian Formation of the Jehol Group."[7] However, a later study by Ji et al. argued that the key indicator of the Jehol biota are the index fossils Peipiaosteus and Lycoptera. Under this definition, the earliest evolutionary stage of the Jehol Biota is represented by the Huajiying Formation, and the Daohugou Formation is excluded due to the absence of Lycoptera fossils.[8] Later in 2006, Liu et al. published their own study of the age of the Daohugou beds, this time using Zircon Uranium-lead dating on the volcanic rocks overlying and underlying salamander-bearing layers (salamanders are often used as index fossils). Liu et al. found that the beds formed between 164 and 158 million years ago, in the Middle to Late Jurassic.[1][9] A 2012 study by Gao and Shubin agreed with this assessment, and reported an Argon–argon date of 164 plus or minus 4 million years ago for the Daohugou horizon.[10]

Animal fossil content

edit

Arthropods

edit

At least 760 insect species have been described from the Haifanggou Formation and associated deposits, making it one of the most diverse insect-bearing strata from the Jurassic period.[11]

Insects
GenusSpeciesYearAbundanceNotesImages
AhirmoneuraA. neimengguensis[12]2008A tangle-veined fly
Juracimbrophlebia

Mongolarachne
AneurodermaA. oiodes[13]20212 specimensAn earwig
ApplanatiforcepsA. angustus[14]20233 specimensAn earwig
ArchaboilusA. musicus[15]20121 specimenA stem-katydid
EkpaglodermaE. gracilentum[14]20231 specimenAn earwig
FormosibittacusF. macularis[16]20081 specimenA hangingfly
FortiholcorpaF. paradoxa[17]20131 specimenA Mecopteran
JuracimbrophlebiaJ. ginkgofolia[18]20121 specimenA hangingfly
JurahylobittacusJ. astictus[16]20081 specimenA hangingfly
MesobunusM. dunlopi[19]20121 specimenA harvestman
MiriholcorpaM. forcipata[17]20131 specimenA Mecopteran
MongolarachneM. jurassica[20]2011A spider
MongolbittacusM. daohugoensis[21]20071 specimenA hangingfly
PseudomantinaP. baijuyii[22]2023A cockroach
PycnopolystoechotesP. striatus[23]2023A lacewing
SinojuraphisS. ningchengensis[24]2008An aphid
SinopalaeodermataS. concavum[13]20211 specimenAn earwig
StictopolystoechotesS. sparsulus[23]2023A lacewing

Vertebrates

edit

Based largely on.[25]

GenusSpeciesYearNotesImages
Chunerpeton[26]C. tianyiensis2003A salamander
JeholotritonJ. paradoxusA salamander
NeimengtritonN. daohugouensisA salamander
PangerpetonP. sinensisA salamander
PedopennadaohugouensisA maniraptoran dinosaur
EpidexipteryxhuiA scansoriopterygid dinosaur
Epidendrosaurusningchengensis
VolaticotheriumV. antiquumA gliding eutriconodont mammal
Castorocauda[27]C. lutrasimilis2006An aquatic docodont mammaliaform
MicrodocodonM. gracilisA docodont mammaliaform
AgilodocodonA, scansoriusA docodont mammaliaform
MegaconusM. mammaliaformisA possible allotherian mammal
Mirusodens[28]M. caiian arboreal/climbing euharamiyidan mammal/mammaliaform
PseudotribosP. robustusA shuotheriid mammaliaform
Liaosteus[29]L. hongi1995A peipiaosteid fish
Yanliaomyzon[30]Y. ingensdentes2023A lamprey


Flora

edit
Fossil plants
GenusSpeciesStateAbundanceNotesImages
ConiopterisC. bella[31]LiaoningA fern
C. burejensis[31]LiaoningA fern
SequoiaS. jeholensis[32]NingchengThe earliest known redwood tree
SchmeissneriaS. sinensis[33]LiaoningUncertain plant originally described as angiosperm.[34]
XingxueanthusX. sinensis[35]LiaoningUncertain plant originally described as angiosperm.[36]
EuanthusE. paniiLiaoning[37]Uncertain plant originally described as angiosperm.[34]

See also

edit

References

edit

Further reading

edit
  • Liaoning Stratigraphic Group. 1978. The Stratigraphic Tables of Liaoning. Geology Press 1-296